Your web browser is out of date. Please upgrade it for a better experience viewing this website.

Obama’s Plan B Debacle

Written By: Ellen Marshall
December 8, 2011

 

The Obama Administration’s misstep in overturning the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) recommendation on Plan B emergency contraception caught everyone off guard, primarily because it is in such violation of its own policies on science driving public health.

The FDA yesterday recommended that Plan B One-Step emergency contraception (EC) be available to women of all ages over the counter without a prescription who are at risk for an unplanned pregnancy.  Currently it is only available to those older than 18 even though evidence is that it is safe for those younger than that.  Many believe FDA’s recommendation was going to be an important step forward after the Bush Administration – once again in violation of the FDA’s recommendation – blocked over the counter access to EC.

We thought this kind of politics-trumping-health action was a thing of the past – but evidently that’s not the case.  Even when it is in complete violation of the Administration’s own policy for scientific integrity – which states that “Science and the scientific process must inform and guide decisions of my Administration on a wide range of issues, including improvement of public health, protection of the environment, increased efficiency in the use of energy and other resources, mitigation of the threat of climate change, and protection of national security.  The public must be able to trust the science and scientific process informing public policy decisions….”

We’d guess that this is more about political pandering to some…but certainly not to women who know prevention is prevention – and that this is their right. And the government has stated a number of times in various policy efforts that contraceptive methods are part of preventive services.  This action continues to limit access for many to this method of preventing an unplanned pregnancy.

Advocates are undertaking several steps to try to get the Administration to undo this wrong – and one easy way you can help is to add your name to this petition asking the Administration to not let politics trump science.

Who knows if we can change this major misstep, but they need to know we think it is simply wrong.

7 Responses to "Obama’s Plan B Debacle"
  1. @Alan I was wanting to send you a message via email but I got the “Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently” error. It looks like you wrote your email wrong. Can you please contact me?

  2. I have to express some appreciation to you for bailing me out of this type of scenario. After looking out through the internet and coming across solutions which are not beneficial, I was thinking my entire life was done. Existing devoid of the answers to the problems you have sorted out by way of this site is a crucial case, as well as ones which could have adversely damaged my entire career if I had not come across your blog post. Your personal know-how and kindness in controlling all areas was important. I don’t know what I would have done if I hadn’t come across such a point like this. I can at this point look ahead to my future. Thank you very much for the expert and effective guide. I won’t hesitate to endorse your blog to anyone who needs to have assistance about this situation.

  3. Stephen says:

    Amazing how simple it can be to communicate with people and have them understand a certain topic, you made my day.

    Sexual & Reproductive Health Thousand Oaks

  4. Paulo says:

    “Han havde lært hjmemefra, at skaberværket var perfekt og skønt, og det gav ham anfægtelser, når han så, at det ikke kun var perfekt og skønt.”Så min pointe er altså stadig valid, er hvad du siger: Darwin tog udgangspunkt i de populære påstande der fandtes om guds natur i hans tid, og ikke han egen idé om gud, eftersom at han ikke troede på gud.“Men nej, siger en mindre gruppe blandt os gudetroende; den er flawed by design.”Aha, så universets skaber, var altså grusom nok, til at opfinde den hveps Darwin nævner i hans citat? Hvis gud er så grusom, hvorfor så tilbede ham? Og hvorfor kalde ham “god”, når han åbenlyst er mindst ligeså psykopatisk anlagt som “Q” fra Star Trek-universet? Men i kalder ham måske heller ikke “god”?

  5. Mika Castro says:

    The Obama administration threw science under the bus long before this. Take a look at how the feds (don’t) license research into the therapeutic potential of cannabis. Only anti-cannabis clinical research is permitted. So, yes, Obama has sacrificed science to politics and this flap over Plan B isn’t the first example.baby eagle

  6. Since the vast majority of rapes are committed by persons known to the victim, the initiation and process of a rape investigation depends much on the victim's willingness and ability to report and describe a rape. Biological evidence such as semen, blood, vaginal secretions, saliva, and vaginal epithelial cells (typically collected by a rape kit) may be identified and genetically typed by a crime lab.

Leave a Reply